Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Can Christians vote for a Mormon on 11-6-12 ?



“The Kingdom is not riding on whatever happens on election day and the church’s mission isn’t going to change regardless of what happens . . . on Election Day.”
Dr. R. Albert Mohler

January 20, 1961, marked the Inauguration of the 35th President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, a Catholic. January 20, 2013, could mark the Inauguration of the 45th President of the United States, Mitt Romney, a Mormon. Evangelicals across the fruited plains are weighing carefully the potential consequence that electing a Mormon will present Mormonism as more acceptable to Americans as electing a Catholic in 1961 did for Roman Catholicism; it seemed to cast it as more mainstream.  I suggest that the particular competence of the candidate for governing and protecting the American people is the question that should be answered, rather than “Is this candidate a born-again Christian?” or “Will this candidate’s faith, if elected, make his faith more acceptable world-wide?”  So, without endorsing any one candidate, here are some compelling questions to ask:

Morally, does the Mormon candidate support and protect the sanctity of human life?

 In the June 2011 edition of the National Review, Mitt Romney stated his position on life by saying,

“I am pro-life and believe that abortion should be limited to only instances of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. I support the reversal of Roe vs. Wade because it is bad law and bad medicine.” He continued, “I support the Hyde Amendment, which broadly bars the use of Federal funds for abortions. . . . I will support efforts to prohibit Federal funding for any organization like Planned Parenthood.”

 President Obama, when speaking about the nearly 40 years of the consequences of Roe v Wade and 50 million babies legally killed, said,

As we mark the 39th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we must remember that this Supreme Court decision not only protects a woman’s health and reproductive freedom, but also affirms a broader principle: that government should not intrude on private family matters. I remain committed to protecting a woman’s right to choose and this fundamental constitutional right. . . . And as we remember this historic anniversary, we must also continue our efforts to ensure that our daughters have the same rights, freedoms, and opportunities as our sons to fulfill their dreams.”


Morally, does the Mormon candidate support the Biblical, traditional definition of marriage?  Mitt Romney, while speaking at the Liberty University commencement ceremony in Lynchburg, VA, on May 12, 2012, said to the 30,000 attendees:

“Marriage is a relationship between one man and one woman.”

A few days prior to Romney’s stated position, President Barack Obama became the first sitting President of the United States to affirm same-sex marriage.  In a sit-down interview with ABC’s Robin Roberts, the President stated,

"I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or Marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that Don't Ask Don't Tell is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married."



Domestically and financially, does the Mormon candidate have a record of competence in managing and balancing a governmental budget responsibly? As of today, the National Debt Clock had $16,211,381,872,754.61 as the total indebtedness of the United States. Now that is a snapshot, because as you know, the numbers are constantly rising at a mind-boggling rate! The National Debt continues to increase an average of $3.88 billion per day! With an estimated population in the USA of 313,773,479, each US citizen’s share of this debt is $51,665.88! The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender. (Proverbs 22:7). Do not be a man who strikes hands in a pledge or puts up security for debts; if you lack the means to pay, your very bed will be snatched from under you. (Proverbs 22:26-27) This is the Word of the LORD! President Obama’s answer to the country’s indebtedness was a 787 billion dollar stimulus, a mandatory health care system that will remove 700 billion dollars from Medicare, and looming penalties for over 6 million Americans who fail to purchase healthcare. In addition, the President submitted a budget with $1.5 trillion in deficit spending. It was so abysmal, when the Senate brought it up for a vote, not even one Democratic Senator voted in favor of the Obama proposed budget. The vote was 0-97! As Governor of the state of Massachusetts, Governor Romney presented a balanced budget each year.



Militarily, does the Mormon candidate believe in “peace through strength” and is he pro-Israel?  A Gallup poll reported that the United States Military overwhelmingly supports Governor Romney by a margin of 58% to 38%, and that veterans’ support was even more significant at 59% to 32%. One of the main reasons is because the military doesn’t believe that the President supports them fully. For instance, the President has supported a “Sequestration” as part of the Budget Control Acts that would devastatingly reduce our Defense. These cuts come as a result of a fairy-tale narrative that the President and his administration believe, namely, “that war is receding.” Osama Bin Laden is dead, and that pretty much ended the “war on terrorism,” in their mind. This “living in their own world” for foreign policy seems to have played a significant role in the Benghazi debacle.

Earlier this month, a lawmaker from the Israeli Prime Minister’s political party said of President Obama, “He is no friend of Israel . . . . His policies have been catastrophic.”  Governor Romney, in contrast, has enjoyed a personal friendship with the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, for over 35 years. Romney has convincingly argued that under President Obama, the USA has “downgraded Israel from being our ‘closest ally’ in the Middle East to being only ‘one of our closest allies.’” Romney’s perspective appears to be true by considering the President’s own words: "During the [Bush Presidency] there was no space between us and Israel, and what did we get from that? When there is no daylight, Israel just sits on the sidelines, and that erodes our credibility with the Arab states."

Practically, are you voting for a “President” or a “pastor?”  President Obama claims to be a believer in Jesus Christ. Do you have fundamental disagreements with him morally and domestically? Governor Romney claims to be a believer of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Do you support much of his political platform? When I vote for a President, should their particular doctrinal statement be a litmus test for whom I should vote? Maybe an illustration would bring clarity. When flying in an airplane, how concerned are you that the pilot is a believer? (Now, this question should not figure in in one’s view of the Rapture! :-) Mostly, we are concerned that the pilot is qualified, alert, and experienced as a pilot. What about an upcoming surgery? Do you ask about the particular orthodoxy of the surgeon prior to the surgery? Again, probably not. So, what about a President? Similar logic should guide us. 


So, CHRISTIANS SHOULD VOTE  on November 6, 2012! Be informed. To be properly informed, visit Cornerstone to find out how the candidates running in our town voted on these issues in the last legislative session. Click Here

3 comments:

Jason Hunsicker said...

I couldn't agree with you more. I have met some Christians that say things like, "I'm not voting for him because he's Mormon." I try to compel them by explaining to them that if they don't vote, it's like they're approving of Obama. They're giving him one more vote. Thanks for being a voice of reason amongst Christians!

Rich said...

On the abortion exception, I'd like to add this. Obviously as Christians we value every life including the ones that are the result of rape. But, I want to point out that if Roe V Wade were overturned and the exception were to remain, those who serve to inform women who will potentially get an abortion and try to help them chose life over abortion will be more effective since there will be a fraction of the amount of abortions as there have been in prior decades. Prolifers will be able to redirect their energies and resources in a much less strained and overworked national environment. They would be able to more effectively help rape victims recover and make a difficult choice to hopefully keep or adopt out the baby. I look at it this way. Between now and when the Lord comes back, we can.... Start saving what will amount to millions of Babies by allowing candidates to make the exceptions and gain some ground.... Or Demand a no exception platform and do so at the expense of those that we had the ability to save. Also, say what you will about George W. Bush, He did sign the Partial birth abortion ban in 2003. It was a huge step in the right direction. I find it interesting when I mention the phrase "Partial Birth Abortion" to my Christian friends that they usually respond, "what is that?" It's a sad day when Christians find every excuse to avoid voting, yet they know very little about history. Please study the issues and the candidates almost as much as you do the Bible.
In case you need more history on the progress made against abortion, here's a link.
http://www.rtl.org/prolife_issues/LifeNotes/AddressingPBAs.html
Here's a link incase you want to know how "Jane Roe" feels about Roe V Wade today now that she is pro life. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_MUUvcvjEg

Thanks everyone!

Scott S said...

Please remember that Pro-life with any exceptions is not only "not pro-life" it is also politically unsustainable. The left is having a field day with this illogical stance. I would love to see Roe v Wade overturned, but bear in mind - here in California nothing will change. Overturning Roe v Wade simply sends the issue back to the states. California will not alter course. So...The fight cannot be relegated to Washington - and especially not to a known compromising candidate. My wife and I are very active in a local crisis pregnancy center and give large amounts of money in that fight. That is where the battle is at. But, If we are going to lean at all on Washington, then let's start a campaign to re-populate the Senate and House with Pro-Life votes.

While the Mormon issue is disturbing to me, the greater issue in my mind is that he is not conservative. We limped along under President Bush who was socially conservative, but fiscally not so much so. Now we face the possibility of a nominally "Conservative Republican" candidate who has a track record of being socially moderate to liberal, and generally fiscally conservative. I would rather have it the other way if I could choose. ...And I would have, but the primaries never made it to California. But, the "Christian" party has chosen a candidate that will support their portfolios and they hope he will actually change into the person he has claimed to be during the election. Don't hold your breath.

My concern since the convention has been in the fact that "we" have again settled for (if not been duped into) a candidate that is NOT CONSERVATIVE. As conservatism is deteriorated, you can begin to kiss all of our individual liberties goodby. Name your pet conservative issue - it has just slipped closer to the brink. I was shown a facebook posting (I despise facebook) that had a list of reasons to vote for a certain candidate. Following each was a list of Bible passages to supposedly support the position. Each item included the phrase "The Most..." and at the top of the list was "The Most Pro-Life". That is alarming, to think that Christians are content to support the "most" pro-life candidate. Think about that... Where have we come to as Christians? "The most" is code for "oh well, close enough." How far deteriorated does our candidate have to get before we say "Stop it!! This guy doesn't represent me!"

Much prayer and counsel have gone into my decisions. My votes have already been cast absentee.

I respect your position, and am thrilled to see so many Christians actually THINKING about this election. That alone is novel and certain to bring positive change. We may disagree on some points, but the fact that we are seeking God's mind on these issues is fantastic.